I read your latest preview of TNA's BFG and I must say...all you did was bash the living hell out of it! This PPV has many great aspects to it and there will be many great matches that will deliver, but you only pointed out the bad in each and every match (Not that I disagree with you on some of the points you made).
First of all, you talked about the Ultimate X match like it was a piece of crap. Granted, most of the points you made were true (No publicity or build-up between the two teams that are going to be involved and XXX meaning nothing), but it's still going to be a kick-ass match! I think LAX is still a great tag team whether they're heel or face because these two are two of the most talented guys in professional wrestling history!
Moving on to the tag title match, I agree with you there completely. But you think the titles are going to mean nothing because AJ Styles and Tomko hold them? PLEASE! Styles is one of the greatest ever! A match with him will almost never fail to deliver. Plus, if your prediction with Ultimate X is correct, think of this: "Two teams going for the gold...each team has one member with speed and another member with power, two aspects that make a killer team! Which team has more of it though? Find out!!!" Will TNA promote the match like this? I don't know. Even if they don't, you can still look at it like that (I do).
The Cage vs Joe match will be kick-ass as well! The match may turn out the way you say and it may not (I personally hope your prediction doesn't come true). Secondly, you think Joe's gonna walk out of TNA because he didn't win the championship? Did Chris Benoit walk out of WWF when he didn't win the title after numerous tries? Did Chris Jericho walk out of WWE because he went from a main eventer to a mid-carder? (He walked out to start a music career) If you don't work backstage at TNA, please do not talk about what a wrestler is thinking. Joe even said himself that he wasn't leaving TNA and that he was satisfied with his position in the company.
Steiners vs 3-D - I agree with you: no one cares anymore and there was very little build-up, but once again, it will still deliver past expectations because it's 2 out of 3 tables. I disagree with you on the part where you think it will continue between these two teams. I think this is the final chapter.
TNA's creative team is less imaginative than WWE? Wait, doesn't WWE have a midget chasing a woman around with a towel on as a major storyline? Granted, TNA's booking is far from perfect right now, but they've still got some pretty good ideas. They just need to learn to follow through with them better than they have been doing.
Kurt Angle and Sting will still be a kick-ass match regardless of the current events surrounding Kurt right now (I pray it's not as serious as the news is making it out to be). It's still a dream match that, in my opinion, stands a chance of being the match of the year. I do agree with you on Sting needing to win so Kurt Angle can get some help, though, no matter if the situation is serious or not. We don't need another Chris Benoit incident any time soon (Ever again for that).
You have good arguments and supportive evidence to go with them, but in order for your articles to be great, you might want to consider pointing out the good in TNA at the same time because, whether you want to believe it or not, there are many good things in TNA.
your thoughts, everyone?
2 comments:
"TNA's creative team is less imaginative than WWE?" I don't think it's fair to treat that statement as sarcastically as you are. Both creative teams suck out loud.
You also seem to think every match will "kick-ass", and true, they all have the potential to be great (Cage-Joe not withstanding) but what are the odds that every guy will delver?
I do agree with you that Styles and Tomko should be fantastic champions, and it's being booked as if the two are about to take a step back from Cage, which would be awesome!
One final point. Sting-Angle is a dream match, if it was five years ago. Even though Sting can still keep it together in a match, and is one of the all-time greats, I think it's fair to say you're over selling him. Anyway, it should be a decent PPV, I just hope TNA don't screw it up.
You harp on the fact that he didn't point out the "good parts" of all the matches on the card.
With that said, the only good thing you pointed out about each match was that it could be kick-ass. Ok, bloggers & columnists usually don't have to point out if a match COULD be kick-ass or not - the reader already knows.
With that in mind, what are the good parts you felt he failed to point out?
Post a Comment