This could almost be worthy of a full blown column, but let me go this route for now. I read a report that tonight's mystery partner with CM Punk is possibly going to be Kane, and that Kane would be on ECW permanently. I think that's ridiculous. The chance of Undertaker and Kane teaming up, FOR ANY AMOUNT OF TIME that they remain as active competitors, is too good to pass up, and they should be kept on Smackdown. Kane should be given another title run, but we won't go down that road.
So Booker and Sharmell are officially released from WWE. I'm not sure how to respond to this. Part of me wants to complain thinking Booker has been nothing short of a crybaby since his 'suspension', and his promotion being passed over for FCW as the new developmental territory, and part of me wants to say c'est la vie and que sara sara.
Whichever way it is, and you'll never know unless you ask, it's becoming heir apparent that the new blood in WWE better damn well step up quickly, or the company is going to be in very hot water, very quickly.
2 comments:
It appears that ECW and Smackdown are becoming one brand. On wwe.com they have an article up about some "agreement" between Estrada and Vickie Guerrero allowing wrestlers to wrestle on both nights. That might be where the Kane angle comes into play.
Hold up there Mike, Kane on ECW is a dream-come-true. It would finally allow him to really be shown as the dominant monster he is, and not have him jobbing to losers like Khali and Henry. Let's face it if ECW let Kane go Hardcore, he could carry that company as champion, no questions asked.
Post a Comment